[Discuss] MS and Novell

[Thor Heinrichs-Wolpert]

SuSe, as a Linux distro can't be compared to SCO, so the FUD is un-warranted, unless you own RedHat stock *g*.

As SuSe is still the base for the Linux used by IBM and Sun ... and that these 2 are even less likely to make themselves more dependant on RedHat with Oracle sending an arrow at the heart of RedHat ... I'm not too worried.

Thor HW

-----Original Message-----
From: discuss-bounces at vlug.org on behalf of Alan W. Irwin
Sent: Wed 11/8/2006 10:34 AM
To: discuss at vlug.org
Subject: RE: [Discuss] MS and Novell
 
On 2006-11-08 09:15-0800 Thor Heinrichs-Wolpert wrote:

> Novell also made sure their free SuSe offering is equivalent to the one
available for subscription, unlike RedHat and was one of the main reasons we
moved to SuSe.

Well I hope you are right, and my gloomy forecast for Novell and SuSe is
wrong.  SuSe has a long and honorable Linux history, and it would be a shame
to see it vanish through Novell ineptitude.

OTOH, it might be good to at least review your exit strategy from SuSe. If
it suddenly goes south you don't want to end up in the position of the last
of the SCO-Unix users. Also remember what happened to Corel Linux just after
Corel made the deal with MS.

Alan
__________________________
Alan W. Irwin

Astronomical research affiliation with Department of Physics and Astronomy,
University of Victoria (astrowww.phys.uvic.ca).

Programming affiliations with the FreeEOS equation-of-state implementation
for stellar interiors (freeeos.sf.net); PLplot scientific plotting software
package (plplot.org); the Yorick front-end to PLplot (yplot.sf.net); the
Loads of Linux Links project (loll.sf.net); and the Linux Brochure Project
(lbproject.sf.net).
__________________________

Linux-powered Science
__________________________
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss at vlug.org
http://ladybug.vlug.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss