[Discuss] 'C' string tokenizer for those who hate strtok
Brian Quinlan
brian at sweetapp.com
Fri Jun 30 10:53:49 PDT 2006
David Bronaugh wrote:>
> However, I'm curious about your testing:
> - First, pw's Makefile specifies conflicting optimizations -- the last
> one is -O0 so I believe that's the one that stands. I changed that first.
I actually used the same compiler flags as the Python build and didn't
bother with the Makefile (it's a one file program).
> - Second, it seems that more than half the time spent in the C code is
> spent calling printf. I removed the printf call and the program runs
> more than twice as fast.
I wrote my own main function which just grabbed the time, called the
tokenizing function 10,000 times in a loop (freeing the memory after
each run) and then printed out the difference between the time at the
start and the time at the end.
> My test input is up at http://bronaugh.linuxboxen.org/test.txt -- can
> you please make these changes and compare? For that matter, rip the
> print out of the Python, for fairness.
There was no printing in the Python version either. I'm leaving on
holiday for a week beginning tomorrow morning so I might not get to this
until I get back.
> Keep in mind that I just wanted to clean up the current code, not
> rearchitect it. My own opinions is -- just use strtok_r.
And my opinion is -- just use Python (or Ruby [or Perl]).
Cheers,
Brian
More information about the Discuss
mailing list